Pedagogical Innovation and Its Impact on the Teaching of Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63969/484p3c89Keywords:
pedagogical innovation, higher education, mathematics education, statistics education, physics education, active learningAbstract
Teaching subjects such as mathematics, statistics, and physics in higher education represents a significant challenge due to their high level of abstraction and cognitive demand. In this context, pedagogical innovation emerges as a key strategy to improve teaching-learning processes. This study aims to analyze the impact of innovative pedagogical practices on learning in these disciplines through a narrative review of scientific literature. The methodology was based on collecting and analyzing relevant studies from academic databases, prioritizing research on active methodologies, educational technologies, and student-centered approaches. The results show that strategies such as problem-based learning, collaborative learning, gamification, and digital tools significantly enhance motivation, participation, and understanding of complex content. Furthermore, pedagogical innovation promotes higher-order cognitive skills such as critical thinking and problem-solving. It is concluded that implementing innovative pedagogical practices not only improves academic performance but also transforms the roles of teachers and students, fostering more meaningful and contextualized learning.
Downloads
References
Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
rendimiento y la reducción de la ansiedad matemática. Sapiens Discoveries International Journal, 3(1).
Angulo Guerrero, R. J. (2025). Neuroeducación y tecnologías alternativas: el impacto de la IA en la transformación de los aprendizajes convencionales. Star of Sciences Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.63969/3d31p680
Angulo Guerrero, R. J., Acuri Pacheco, D. A., Rivera Quiñonez, E. D., Solís Mina, J. J., Solís Mina, R. R., & Solís Mina, A. N. (2025). Desarrollo de habilidades de pensamiento crítico mediante problemas de matemáticas aplicadas. Star of Sciences Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.63969/90r9yd78
Angulo Guerrero, R. J., & Garcia Camacho, D. J. (2023). Optimización de procesos de producción mediante el uso de algoritmos genéticos. Revista Ingeniería, 7(18). https://doi.org/10.33996/revistaingenieria.v7i18.109
Angulo Guerrero, R. J., Alvarado León, B. L., & Guzmán Hernández, R. (2024). Desafíos y oportunidades en la formación técnica y pedagógica de docentes en educación superior en Esmeraldas. REINCISOL, 3(6).
Angulo Guerrero, R. J. (2024). Gestión pedagógica basada en evidencia mediante modelos matemáticos y herramientas digitales. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación.
Angulo Guerrero, R. J., et al. (2025). Matemáticas disruptivas: transformando el aprendizaje universitario con innovaciones pedagógicas. Lexenlace Revista Latinoamericana.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Illeris, K. (2018). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists in their own words (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erick Daniel Rivera Quiñonez , Andrea Carolina Benítez Barro , María Gabriela Zambrano Álvarez , José Aníbal Angulo De León (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los artículos publicados en la revista se distribuyen bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Esta licencia permite a terceros descargar, copiar, distribuir, adaptar y reutilizar una obra, incluso con fines comerciales, siempre que se otorgue el crédito adecuado al autor original.
